Grover's 'Inductance Calculations' Supplementary information and errata
Version 1.00. 4th June 2012 David Knight* & Rodger Rosenbaum
2
3
A complete recalculation of tables 1, 2, and 3 has been given by Rodger Rosenbaum 1 . Most of the errors are small except for the one shown above, which should be marked on any working copy.
Chapter 15: Pages 122 - 141
A discussion of the accuracy of Grover's tabular calculation method is given by Engel and Rohe 2 . Claims made in that paper relating to inaccuracies in Grover's method may however be flawed due to the assumption that the FEEFC calculations carried out were equivalent to actual measurements. Rodger Rosenbaum investigated this matter in April 2009, and apart from changes in the last digit of some tabulated values, no errors were found in Grover's work.
1 GMDs of equal parallel rectangles. Re-calculation of Grover's table 1, 2, and 3. Rodger Rosenbaum. 2009.
Available from g3ynh.info. 2 A Comparison of Single-Layer Coaxial Coil Mutual Inductance Calculations Using Finite-Element and
Tabulated Methods, Thomas G Engel and Stacy N Rohe. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol 42, No. 9, Sept. 2006. p2159-2163.
4
Pages 143 - 147
Formula 119 on page 143, is Coffin's formula truncated, which is in turn an extended version of the Rayleigh-Niven formula 3 . The second term in the series should be: . . . + (β²/8)[ln(4/β) + 1/4] - . . . Consideration was given to the possibility that Grover might be correcting errors in the 1911 document, but a comparison against Lundin's formula 4 indicated that ¼ was the best choice for the term in question. Rodger Rosenbaum has since compared the formula against Lorenz's exact expression, and confirms this conclusion as shown below:
3 Formulas and Tables for the calculation of mutual and self induction. E B Rosa and F W Grover. 3rd edition
1916 with 1948 corrections BS Sci. 169 (available from g3ynh.info). See pages 116 - 117, formulas 69 and 71. 4 A Handbook Formula for the Inductance of a Single-Layer Circular Coil. R. Lundin Proc. IEEE, vol. 73, no. 9,
pp. 1428-1429, Sep. 1985.
5
6
7
Pages 149 - 150
A recalculation of Rosa's mutual inductance correction factor H (Table 39, p150) to 10 decimal places, and a discussion of the GMD method, is given by Bob Weaver 5 . Grover's table has no errors greater than 1 in the last digit, but the more accurate information may be preferred. Bob's article also provides information on the coding of calculation routines. A one-line continuous formula which gives H with a maximum absolute error of better than ±0.000 000 02 is given by David Knight 6 .
5 Investigation of Rosa's round-wire mutual inductance correction formula. Robert Weaver, 2008. Available from
g3ynh.info. 6 Rosa's mutual inductance correction for the round-wire solenoid. David Knight, 2010. available from
g3ynh.info.
8
Page 156
Page 161
On page 161, the last line in formula 134 reads: a=2.451b But this has to be 2a=2.451b The number "2" is missing. For confirmation, see line 1 of formula 134: 2a/b=2.451
(error found by Thomas Heckel, Feb. 2011)
9
Page 164
Here the error can be seen by looking back at formula 135 (p163); Grover used the diameter (12 inches) instead of the radius (6 inches). The above should read:
and the inductance of the helix is:
David Knight & Rodger Rosenbaum. April 2009. Updated March 2011, June 2012 (converted to pdf).